21st Century Skills
06.23.10
After reading the articles posted, I find it easy to agree with both sides of the argument. However, if I were to pick a side, I would say that I do not see a problem with incorporating 21st century skills into the classroom. Though I do not agree that these skills should be created by corporations or only used as a basis to be better than other states, countries, counties, etc. I think that it is important for students to be learning the “core skills” but also to be exposed to different ideas involving technology and higher-order thinking.
I think that acts such as No Child Left Behind have created such an emphasis on high-stakes testing that some classrooms may focus so much on having students memorize content for the tests, and may steer away from anything that may not necessarily be on the test. Unfortunately, this can also steer away from activities that may involve critical thinking or use of technology. I acknowledge that it is important for students to learn the “standards of learning” but it is also important for students to be able to relate concepts to real life and be able to take more away from a lesson than just “I am going to memorize this for the test and then probably forget it once the test is over”.
In reading the articles, I note that Colette Cairns, in the 21st Century Skills article, describes the process of integrating technology into lessons, using Skype and Google Maps, and how this led to previously unmotivated students getting excited about learning and spending extra time working on projects. I think this is inspiring and a good example of how the 21st century skills approach can work well.
I found these articles interesting and plan to read more on the subject.
